A Testimony to a Functioning US Justice System?

A potential prison sentence of up to 25 years looms over Hunter Biden for providing false information during a gun purchase, sparking contrasting reactions within the political spectrum. While Democrats see the verdict as a testament to a fair legal system, Republicans view it as a mere distraction tactic.

Once again, a court ruling in the United States has captured headlines, this time focusing on President’s son Hunter Biden, who has been found guilty on all three counts of violating firearms regulations. This marks the first instance ever of a child of a sitting president being convicted on a federal level. Special prosecutor David Weiss emphasized, following the sentencing, that nobody is above the law. Hunter Biden now faces a $750,000 fine and a potential 25-year prison term. However, given his lack of prior criminal record, it is unlikely that such severe penalties will be enforced.

It didn’t take long for US President Joe Biden to respond. In a written statement, he expressed his acceptance of the ruling against his son while assuring Hunter Biden of his unwavering support. He commended his son’s journey to overcome substance abuse, stating, “I am the President, but I am also a father.” Joe Biden had already indicated in an ABC interview the previous week that he would accept the verdict and ruled out the possibility of pardoning his son.

A test for functional justice?

For Democrats, the conviction of Hunter Biden serves as validation that the US justice system is operating effectively. In contrast, prominent Republicans, led by former presidential candidate Donald Trump, hold a different view. They accuse Joe Biden and the Democrats of abusing the judicial system to silence political opponents.

Democratic Representative Jim McGovern questioned how, in the wake of this conviction, any rational Republican could claim that the Biden administration is wielding the justice system as a weapon to harm Republicans and assist Democrats.

Progressive Democratic Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortes believes President Biden’s handling of the situation showcases the disparity between Democrats and Republicans: “We are not here to contest outcomes. We respect the legal process,” reiterated the Democrat.

A conviction to maintain appearances

The conviction of the President’s son does not serve as evidence of a fair and functional justice system in the eyes of leading Republicans. House Representative Mike Johnson responded to a CNN reporter’s inquiry about whether his belief—that the US justice system employs double standards—had been refuted by this ruling with a negative. Johnson claimed that in this particular case, the evidence was overwhelmingly convincing and did not believe it was the same in Trump’s case. He contended that all charges against Trump were evidently politically motivated, while Hunter Biden’s situation was distinct.

Right-wing media outlets like Fox News echoed similar sentiments. Host Jesse Watters pointed out that convicting a Democrat does not automatically disprove the abuse of the justice system. Meanwhile, ultra-right Republican Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene suggested that the sole reason for Hunter Biden’s conviction was to create the illusion of an impartial justice system.

Disruption to Biden’s campaign

For Taylor Greene and other Republicans, the entirety of the firearms violation process is merely a diversionary tactic. Trump’s campaign team also dismissed the trial as nothing more than a distraction from the alleged real crimes of the Biden family, accusing Hunter Biden of corruption, supposedly implicating Joe Biden as well. Yet, concrete evidence supporting their claims remains elusive.

Despite this, Joe Biden must brace himself for Republican attempts to exploit his son’s conviction to damage his presidential campaign. However, in a recent Emerson College poll, nearly two-thirds of respondents indicated that whether Hunter Biden was convicted would not influence their voting decision. Moreover, looming on the horizon is another legal battle for the 54-year-old, facing charges of multimillion-dollar tax evasion in California come September.